Topics
Zantara AI
AI Business Advisor
Questions about how this applies to your case?
Bali Zero handles visas, company setup, tax and property compliance in Indonesia. Ask us directly on WhatsApp.
Chat with Bali Zero on WhatsAppLoading Zantara...
Topics
Zantara AI
AI Business Advisor
Bali Zero handles visas, company setup, tax and property compliance in Indonesia. Ask us directly on WhatsApp.
Chat with Bali Zero on WhatsAppIndonesia mandated KBLI 2025 through BPS Regulation No. 7 of 2025, effective December 18, 2025, with a transition window that closed in June 2026. Every business operating in Indonesia should now verify that its registered activities align with the new classification system and document any remediation through the current OSS workflow.
There is one operational risk. The system businesses use to register those activities — the Online Single Submission (OSS) portal — must be verified live before filing. Do not rely on February 2026 portal behavior or assume every KBLI 2025 mapping is available for your sector.
This is not speculation. It is the documented operational reality. It now creates a remediation window where prepared businesses can move faster than operators starting from zero.
For anyone unfamiliar with the system, OSS (Online Single Submission) is Indonesia's centralized business licensing portal. Managed by BKPM (the Investment Ministry), it is the sole gateway for obtaining your NIB (Nomor Induk Berusaha) — the master business identification number that underpins every permit, license, and regulatory interaction your company will have in Indonesia.
When you register on OSS, you select KBLI codes that describe your business activities. The system then assigns each activity a risk classification using the Risk-Based Approach (RBA) framework. That classification determines your entire licensing pathway.
The following table shows how OSS-RBA categorizes business activities and what each risk level requires:
| Risk Level | Classification | Licensing Requirement | Approval Process | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Minimal environmental/safety impact | NIB only | Automatic — issued instantly upon registration | Small retail, basic consulting, personal services |
| Medium-Low | Limited risk, standard oversight | NIB + Standard Certificate | Self-declared — business submits compliance statement | Restaurants under certain size, general trading, small workshops |
| Medium-High | Moderate risk, requires verification | NIB + Standard Certificate (Verified) | Government verification required — inspector reviews | Medium manufacturing, food processing, education services |
| High | Significant public safety/environmental impact | NIB + Full Permit (Izin) | Full assessment — AMDAL, technical review, site inspection | Large manufacturing, mining, hazardous chemicals, healthcare facilities |
This table is not academic. Your KBLI code directly determines which row you fall into. When KBLI 2025 introduces new codes, splits existing ones, or reclassifies activities, your risk level — and therefore your entire licensing burden — can change overnight.
Here is what remains useful from the February 2026 operating picture, with live verification required before filing:
OSS readiness must be verified live. Earlier 2026 checks showed KBLI 2020 behavior in the portal. Do not rely on those observations today; confirm the current dropdowns, search functions, and risk-classification engine before filing.
The legal mandate is already in effect. BPS Regulation 7/2025 is not a future obligation — it is current law. Businesses are legally expected to operate under the new classification, yet the registration system does not support it.
No official migration date has been announced. BKPM has not published a timeline for the OSS update. Internal government coordination between BPS (which issues the classification), BKPM (which runs OSS), and the technical ministries (which define risk parameters for each code) is ongoing but opaque.
The June 2026 transition window has closed. There has been no indication of an extension. Treat unresolved KBLI 2020 mappings as overdue unless a live OSS or ministry instruction gives a different pathway for your sector.
This means businesses face a practical compliance risk: legacy mappings can surface during NIB amendments, LKPM submissions, permit renewals, import approvals, or sector-specific filings.
The OSS update is not a simple database swap. The system must integrate several interdependent layers:
Code mapping — Every KBLI 2020 code must be mapped to its 2025 equivalent(s). Some codes split into multiple new codes (one-to-many), others consolidate (many-to-one), and entirely new codes exist with no predecessor.
Risk parameter assignment — Each new KBLI 2025 code requires a risk classification from the relevant technical ministry. A new code for Carbon Capture (39001) needs KLHK to define whether it requires AMDAL. A new digital content code needs Kominfo to set verification requirements.
Investment list alignment — For PT PMA (foreign-owned companies), each code must be cross-referenced against the Positive Investment List (DNI) to determine foreign ownership limits and capital requirements.
System testing — OSS processes thousands of applications daily. Deploying a new classification engine without adequate testing would risk corrupting active applications, issuing incorrect risk levels, or blocking legitimate registrations.
The technical ministries are the bottleneck. BPS published the classification. BKPM is ready to integrate it. But without risk parameters from 30+ ministries and agencies for over 1,500 codes, OSS cannot calculate the licensing pathway.
The correct approach is not to wait passively. Businesses that prepare their evidence now can execute through the current OSS path faster than operators who discover the mismatch only when a transaction is blocked.
Log into OSS and document every KBLI code currently registered on your NIB. For each code, record:
Using the official concordance table published by BPS, identify the KBLI 2025 code(s) that correspond to each of your current codes. Pay attention to three scenarios:
Document every mapping with notes on why you selected each new code. This documentation serves as evidence of due diligence if audited.
Compare the risk classification of your current KBLI 2020 code with the expected classification of the KBLI 2025 equivalent. While official risk levels for new codes have not all been published, you can anticipate changes based on:
If your risk level increases — say from Low to Medium-High — you will need additional licenses that you did not previously require. Budget and plan for this now.
Gather the documents you may need when the current OSS remediation path requires evidence:
OSS behavior can change without a long announcement window. Set up monitoring:
When the current OSS workflow allows KBLI 2025 remediation, businesses should take immediate action. Here is the practical process to verify:
The entire process should be completable in a single session for businesses with straightforward mappings. Complex cases — particularly those with code splits or risk reclassifications — may require multiple sessions and additional document uploads.
For businesses whose updated KBLI codes trigger new licensing requirements, the Fiktif Positif (Deemed Approval) mechanism provides an important safeguard.
Under PP No. 28 of 2025 and the Job Creation Law framework, Fiktif Positif applies to 258 specific KBLI codes. The principle is straightforward: if the relevant government agency fails to respond to your license application within the mandated Service Level Agreement (SLA), your application is automatically approved.
| Stage | What Happens | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Application submitted | Business submits license application through OSS | Day 0 |
| Routed to ministry | OSS forwards application to relevant technical ministry | Day 1 |
| Review period | Ministry reviews, may request clarification | SLA varies by license type |
| SLA expires without response | No approval, rejection, or revision request issued | SLA deadline day |
| Automatic approval | OSS system changes status from "Pending" to "Approved" | Day after SLA expiry |
| License issued | Digital license/certificate generated with full legal validity | Immediate |
The license issued through Fiktif Positif carries the same legal weight as a manually approved one. It is not a temporary or provisional document.
Fiktif Positif does not eliminate accountability. The government retains the right to conduct post-license audits. If an audit reveals that the business does not actually meet the requirements for the license, the approval can be revoked retroactively. This shifts the model from pre-license gatekeeping to post-license enforcement.
Businesses should not rely on Fiktif Positif as a strategy to circumvent legitimate requirements. Instead, treat it as insurance against bureaucratic delay — submit complete and accurate applications, and let the mechanism protect you from slow processing.
Registering under a "close enough" KBLI 2020 code while waiting. If your actual activity aligns with a new KBLI 2025 code that does not exist in the current system, do not register under an approximate KBLI 2020 code. This creates a discrepancy that could be flagged as data falsification during future audits.
Ignoring the transition because the portal path looks unclear. The legal obligation exists independent of interface uncertainty. Businesses that cannot demonstrate proactive remediation steps may face scrutiny after the deadline.
Assuming your risk level will stay the same. KBLI 2025 introduces new codes with potentially different risk profiles. A code split could place part of your operations in a higher risk tier, requiring licenses you have never needed before.
Waiting until a blocked transaction. When a filing, import approval, or LKPM report exposes a legacy mapping, the remediation window becomes compressed. Operators with pre-approved mapping evidence move faster than those starting from zero.
| Date | Event | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| December 18, 2025 | KBLI 2025 takes legal effect | Begin preparation |
| Earlier 2026 baseline | OSS behavior required monitoring | Keep code mapping and evidence ready |
| Current OSS check | Verify live KBLI 2025 handling | Execute remediation through the current workflow |
| Post-window | Transition window closed | Treat unresolved KBLI 2020 mappings as overdue |
The gap between KBLI 2025's legal mandate and day-to-day OSS execution is not a reason to delay remediation — it is the reason to accelerate it. Businesses that have their code mappings documented, their risk reclassifications anticipated, and their supporting documents ready can move faster when a filing exposes the issue.
The post-deadline question is whether your records are ready for the current OSS remediation path.
This article reflects the regulatory landscape as of February 2026. OSS system updates may change the procedures described. Consult with a licensed Indonesian corporate secretary or legal advisor for guidance specific to your business situation.